From the existing guide library. Pricing, loan examples and source dates may be historical. Use current written quotes for your purchase. The worksheets use the shared calculation method.
Last updated:
Cessna 182 vs Piper Dakota: Load Hauling Aircraft Comparison
Both the Cessna 182 and Piper Dakota are purpose-built load hauling aircraft that serve regional cargo operations, backcountry missions, and personal transport. Understanding their respective strengths in payload, performance, and operating costs helps operators select the right platform for their specific mission profile.
Aircraft Overview
Both aircraft evolved from similar design philosophy: four-seat aircraft optimized for useful load and reliability.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Cessna 182 | Piper Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| MTOW | 2,950-3,100 lbs | 2,950 lbs |
| Useful Load | 1,600-1,700 lbs | 1,580 lbs |
| Cruise Speed | 140-150 knots | 140 knots |
| Climb Rate | 700-900 fpm | 700 fpm |
| Engine | Continental/Lycoming 230-310 hp | Lycoming O-540 300 hp |
Payload Comparison
Payload capacity is critical for cargo operations; both aircraft excel in this category.
Useful Load Analysis
- 182 advantage: Slightly higher useful load (1,700 lbs vs 1,580 lbs)
- Practical difference: 120 lbs more cargo capacity on 182
- Full fuel scenario: 182 carries more with full tanks (92 gal capacity)
- Dakota: Similar useful load with different weight distribution
- Cargo loading: Both excellent for 1,000+ lb loads with two crew
Performance Characteristics
Performance differences reflect engine power and design evolution.
Speed and Efficiency
- Cruise speed: Essentially equivalent (140-145 knots typical cruise)
- Climb rate: 182 slightly better (700+ fpm vs 650-700 fpm for Dakota)
- Range: Similar practical ranges (600-700 nm)
- Fuel burn: Nearly identical (11-12 gph at cruise)
- High altitude: 182 with turbo superior; standard models equivalent
Operating Cost Analysis
Operating costs are critical for commercial cargo operations.
Annual Operating Costs (100 hours flying)
- Cessna 182: $22,000-28,000 annually
- Piper Dakota: $21,000-27,000 annually
- Difference: Minimal; within 5% of each other
- Purchase price: 182 and Dakota similar; 182 slightly more for newer models
Selection Guide
Choose 182 If You
- Want slightly higher useful load capability
- Prefer turbo option for high-altitude operations
- Value proven Cessna parts support network
- Plan frequent high-elevation airport operations
Choose Dakota If You
- Prefer Piper systems and support network
- Want simpler, lower-cost purchase
- Value excellent visibility and cabin comfort
- Seek reliable platform without turbo complexity