Last updated:
Cessna 182 Performance Review: Speed, Climb, and Mission Capability
The Cessna 182 delivers superior performance across all categories compared to the 172. With better climb rates, faster cruise speeds, extended range, and impressive payload capacity, the 182 transforms flying mission possibilities. Understand the 182's performance characteristics and how they enable operations impossible with lesser aircraft.
Aircraft Specifications
The 182's specifications establish a foundation for understanding its performance advantages.
182 Core Specifications (Standard Configuration)
| Specification | 182P/Q (Std) | 182T (Turbo) |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Lycoming O-540 / 230-310 hp | Lycoming TIO-540 / 310 hp |
| MTOW | 2,950 lbs | 3,100 lbs |
| Useful Load | 1,600 lbs | 1,700 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 92 gallons | 92 gallons |
| Wing Area | 111 sq ft | 111 sq ft |
| Power Loading | 12.8 lbs/hp | 10.0 lbs/hp |
Cruise Performance & Speed
The 182 delivers superior cruise performance, particularly notable when operating from high-density-altitude airports or at significant payload.
Cruise Speed Performance (182P - 230 hp)
| Power | Altitude | Speed | Fuel Burn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75% | 2,000 ft | 137 knots | 11 gph |
| 65% | 5,000 ft | 130 knots | 9.3 gph |
| 55% | 7,000 ft | 120 knots | 7.5 gph |
182T Cruise Speed Performance (310 hp turbo)
- 75% power at 5,000 ft: 145 knots (8 knots faster than standard)
- 65% power at 8,000 ft: 140 knots (excellent for mountain flying)
- 55% power at 10,000 ft: 132 knots (maintains good speed at altitude)
- Real-world advantage: Turbo maintains sea-level performance to 10,000+ ft
Speed Comparison to Competitors
- 182 vs 172: 182 approximately 15-20 knots faster at comparable power settings
- 182 vs Piper Dakota: Similar cruise speed; 182 slightly faster at high altitude
- 182 vs Beechcraft Bonanza: Bonanza slightly faster; 182 more payload
- 182 vs Beechcraft A36: A36 faster; 182 similar useful load
Climb Performance & Altitude
Climb performance is where the 182 truly shines, especially when loaded and operating from high-elevation airports.
Rate of Climb (182P - Sea Level, Maximum Weight)
- Best rate of climb (Vy): 68 knots, 700 fpm at sea level
- Best angle of climb (Vx): 60 knots, 600 fpm at sea level
- At 5,000 ft: Approximately 500 fpm climb rate
- At 10,000 ft: Approximately 250 fpm climb rate
- Service ceiling: 14,500 ft (rate of climb less than 100 fpm)
182T Climb Performance (Turbo - Sea Level)
- Best rate of climb: 70 knots, 900 fpm (200 fpm better than standard)
- At 10,000 ft: Approximately 400 fpm climb rate (150 fpm better)
- At 15,000 ft: Approximately 200 fpm climb rate
- Service ceiling: 18,000 ft (significant advantage for mountain operations)
Mountain Flying Capability
- High-density altitude: 182 maintains excellent climb at high-elevation airports
- Example: At Denver (5,280 ft), 182P climbs at 500+ fpm loaded
- Example: 182T climbs at 700+ fpm under same conditions
- Safety margin: Multiple aircraft possible simultaneously without congestion
- Backcountry operations: 182 enables operations from strips that challenge 172
Range & Endurance
The 182's extended range enables true cross-country operations with meaningful payload.
182P Range Calculations
- Maximum range (no reserve): 1,000+ nm at lean mixture
- Practical range (45-min reserve): 800-850 nm
- Typical cross-country (fuel stops): 600-700 nm per leg
- Endurance: 8-9 hours maximum (depending on power setting)
- Realistic planning: 6-hour mission easily accomplished with reserves
182T Range with Turbo Advantage
- Maximum range: 1,100+ nm (better efficiency at altitude)
- Practical range: 900 nm achievable with 45-min reserve
- High-altitude cruise: Significantly extends practical range
- True cross-country: Cross-country range exceeds most light aircraft
Takeoff & Landing Performance
The 182 provides good short-field capability, though not as extreme as purpose-built backcountry aircraft.
Takeoff Performance (Sea Level, Max Weight)
- Ground roll: 1,850 feet
- Over 50-ft obstacle: 2,850 feet
- At 5,000 ft elevation: 2,500+ feet ground roll
- Soft-field performance: Adequate; not optimized for unimproved surfaces
- Practical minimum: 3,000-foot runways preferred
Landing Performance
- Landing distance (50-ft obstacle to stop): 1,750 feet
- Ground roll: 800 feet from 50-foot altitude
- Short-field performance: Good; suitable for 2,000+ foot runways
- Go-around performance: Excellent climb rate for missed approach
Payload Performance Trade-Offs
Performance is affected by loading; understand realistic performance with typical mission loads.
Performance at Realistic Loading
- Light loading (1,500 lbs): Maximum performance; climb 800+ fpm
- Typical loading (2,500 lbs): Good performance; climb 600+ fpm
- Maximum gross weight: Performance reduced; climb 500-600 fpm
- CG impact: Aft CG improves climb; forward CG reduces climb
- Realistic planning: Budget for 600 fpm climb at typical loading
Performance Across Variants
Different 182 generations offer varying performance characteristics.
Generation Comparison
- Original 182 (O-470): 230 hp; cruise 130 knots; climb 650 fpm
- 182P (Lycoming O-540): 230-310 hp; cruise 137 knots; climb 700 fpm
- 182Q (310 hp): Cruise 145 knots; climb 780 fpm
- 182T (Turbocharged): Maintains performance to 18,000 ft; best for altitude
Real-World Performance Factors
Actual performance varies from specifications based on numerous factors.
Performance Variations
- Engine condition: Worn engines show 50-100 fpm less climb
- Propeller wear: Worn prop reduces speed 5-10 knots
- Temperature: Hot days reduce climb 10-15%; cool days improve performance
- Density altitude: Can reduce performance 20-30% at high elevations in summer
- Aircraft age: Older 182s often perform near specs; well-maintained examples better
Experience 182 Performance
Finance a high-performance aircraft for serious missions.
Get Financing Quote